<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation as a Management Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=innovation-as-a-management-challenge</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidlocke</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>davidlocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-312</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s real easy for Google to say users, not money. They have plenty of money. That mountain of Google money will be the death of the software industry. Google is not a company that any other company can mimic. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a time when seats are more important than money, but a lot of the applications Google comes up with just compete with existing products, and since the category already exists seats are a pointless exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s real easy for Google to say users, not money. They have plenty of money. That mountain of Google money will be the death of the software industry. Google is not a company that any other company can mimic. </p>
<p>There is a time when seats are more important than money, but a lot of the applications Google comes up with just compete with existing products, and since the category already exists seats are a pointless exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-397</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s real easy for Google to say users, not money. They have plenty of money. That mountain of Google money will be the death of the software industry. Google is not a company that any other company can mimic. 

There is a time when seats are more important than money, but a lot of the applications Google comes up with just compete with existing products, and since the category already exists seats are a pointless exercise. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s real easy for Google to say users, not money. They have plenty of money. That mountain of Google money will be the death of the software industry. Google is not a company that any other company can mimic. </p>
<p>There is a time when seats are more important than money, but a lot of the applications Google comes up with just compete with existing products, and since the category already exists seats are a pointless exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidlocke</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>davidlocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-308</guid>
		<description>The point of innovation is to create new categories and the jobs that go with them. Products are just a means to get a technology adopted and win category leadership. Creating products to capture cash misses the point. Cash doesn&#039;t create jobs that can&#039;t be offshored. Sustaining innovation, nice, but so what, the missing millions will continue to be missing. But, why worry about them, since you&#039;re not one of them. If we don&#039;t create new categories and new jobs, we will be one of them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economists tell us that globalism will be good for &quot;us,&quot; as in who the hell is &quot;us,&quot; in the long run, as in &quot;after people die,&quot; as long as we don&#039;t play it as a zero-sum game, as in that&#039;s exactly how we are playing it, otherwise we wouldn&#039;t lose jobs just because we offshored jobs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for a management challenge, stop with the zero sum game. Stop with the culture fit, contractualized open sourcing, the failure to insist that globalized work meet requirements, and get on with real globalization and innovation. Still, left to their training, managers can&#039;t innovate, because they won&#039;t insist on separation, and taking the long road to technology adoption. Management insists that innovation fails. Yes, it fails, because of management practices. Stop it. We know how to succeed, but management just can&#039;t do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of innovation is to create new categories and the jobs that go with them. Products are just a means to get a technology adopted and win category leadership. Creating products to capture cash misses the point. Cash doesn&#39;t create jobs that can&#39;t be offshored. Sustaining innovation, nice, but so what, the missing millions will continue to be missing. But, why worry about them, since you&#39;re not one of them. If we don&#39;t create new categories and new jobs, we will be one of them. </p>
<p>Economists tell us that globalism will be good for &#8220;us,&#8221; as in who the hell is &#8220;us,&#8221; in the long run, as in &#8220;after people die,&#8221; as long as we don&#39;t play it as a zero-sum game, as in that&#39;s exactly how we are playing it, otherwise we wouldn&#39;t lose jobs just because we offshored jobs. </p>
<p>As for a management challenge, stop with the zero sum game. Stop with the culture fit, contractualized open sourcing, the failure to insist that globalized work meet requirements, and get on with real globalization and innovation. Still, left to their training, managers can&#39;t innovate, because they won&#39;t insist on separation, and taking the long road to technology adoption. Management insists that innovation fails. Yes, it fails, because of management practices. Stop it. We know how to succeed, but management just can&#39;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-398</guid>
		<description>The point of innovation is to create new categories and the jobs that go with them. Products are just a means to get a technology adopted and win category leadership. Creating products to capture cash misses the point. Cash doesn&#039;t create jobs that can&#039;t be offshored. Sustaining innovation, nice, but so what, the missing millions will continue to be missing. But, why worry about them, since you&#039;re not one of them. If we don&#039;t create new categories and new jobs, we will be one of them. 

Economists tell us that globalism will be good for &quot;us,&quot; as in who the hell is &quot;us,&quot; in the long run, as in &quot;after people die,&quot; as long as we don&#039;t play it as a zero-sum game, as in that&#039;s exactly how we are playing it, otherwise we wouldn&#039;t lose jobs just because we offshored jobs. 

As for a management challenge, stop with the zero sum game. Stop with the culture fit, contractualized open sourcing, the failure to insist that globalized work meet requirements, and get on with real globalization and innovation. Still, left to their training, managers can&#039;t innovate, because they won&#039;t insist on separation, and taking the long road to technology adoption. Management insists that innovation fails. Yes, it fails, because of management practices. Stop it. We know how to succeed, but management just can&#039;t do that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of innovation is to create new categories and the jobs that go with them. Products are just a means to get a technology adopted and win category leadership. Creating products to capture cash misses the point. Cash doesn&#8217;t create jobs that can&#8217;t be offshored. Sustaining innovation, nice, but so what, the missing millions will continue to be missing. But, why worry about them, since you&#8217;re not one of them. If we don&#8217;t create new categories and new jobs, we will be one of them. </p>
<p>Economists tell us that globalism will be good for &#8220;us,&#8221; as in who the hell is &#8220;us,&#8221; in the long run, as in &#8220;after people die,&#8221; as long as we don&#8217;t play it as a zero-sum game, as in that&#8217;s exactly how we are playing it, otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t lose jobs just because we offshored jobs. </p>
<p>As for a management challenge, stop with the zero sum game. Stop with the culture fit, contractualized open sourcing, the failure to insist that globalized work meet requirements, and get on with real globalization and innovation. Still, left to their training, managers can&#8217;t innovate, because they won&#8217;t insist on separation, and taking the long road to technology adoption. Management insists that innovation fails. Yes, it fails, because of management practices. Stop it. We know how to succeed, but management just can&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcauvin</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>rcauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Google has a different &quot;gating question&quot;.  Check out Marissa Mayer&#039;s 8th innovation principle:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Users not Money: Focus on giving the users what they want and not on money it will generate. If enough users get what they want, money will follow. Google does not do business cases for launching new features.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-management-principles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-manage...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know if I agree completely with Mayer, but I do believe that having millions of users indicates value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has a different &#8220;gating question&#8221;.  Check out Marissa Mayer&#39;s 8th innovation principle:</p>
<p>&#8220;Users not Money: Focus on giving the users what they want and not on money it will generate. If enough users get what they want, money will follow. Google does not do business cases for launching new features.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-management-principles.html" rel="nofollow">http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-manage&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I don&#39;t know if I agree completely with Mayer, but I do believe that having millions of users indicates value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Google has a different &quot;gating question&quot;.  Check out Marissa Mayer&#039;s 8th innovation principle:

&quot;Users not Money: Focus on giving the users what they want and not on money it will generate. If enough users get what they want, money will follow. Google does not do business cases for launching new features.&quot;

http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-management-principles.html

I don&#039;t know if I agree completely with Mayer, but I do believe that having millions of users indicates value.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has a different &#8220;gating question&#8221;.  Check out Marissa Mayer&#8217;s 8th innovation principle:</p>
<p>&#8220;Users not Money: Focus on giving the users what they want and not on money it will generate. If enough users get what they want, money will follow. Google does not do business cases for launching new features.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-management-principles.html" rel="nofollow">http://cdoq.blogspot.com/2007/09/googles-management-principles.html</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I agree completely with Mayer, but I do believe that having millions of users indicates value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Great post Gaurav!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Gaurav!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Great post Gaurav!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Gaurav!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I have no doubt there are exceptions to the &quot;are free products innovative&quot; comment, but it sure has to make one ask whether my product provides any value if I have to offer it for free. Just a nice gating question, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt there are exceptions to the &#8220;are free products innovative&#8221; comment, but it sure has to make one ask whether my product provides any value if I have to offer it for free. Just a nice gating question, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/04/02/innovation-as-a-management-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1212#comment-401</guid>
		<description>I have no doubt there are exceptions to the &quot;are free products innovative&quot; comment, but it sure has to make one ask whether my product provides any value if I have to offer it for free. Just a nice gating question, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt there are exceptions to the &#8220;are free products innovative&#8221; comment, but it sure has to make one ask whether my product provides any value if I have to offer it for free. Just a nice gating question, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

