<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the Roadmap for Planning and Selling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidnayak</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>sidnayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I was referring specifically to the &#039;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#039;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.  &lt;br&gt;I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring specifically to the &#39;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#39;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.  <br />I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?</p>
<p>  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-426</guid>
		<description>I was referring specifically to the &#039;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#039;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.  
I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?

  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring specifically to the &#8216;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#8217;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.<br />
I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?</p>
<p>  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidnayak</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>sidnayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I was referring specifically to the &#039;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#039;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.  &lt;br&gt;I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was referring specifically to the &#39;Roadmap as a Sales Tool&#39;.  I have prepared these documents in the past, and agree with your thoughts on its content 100%.  <br />I am currently working on both internal and sales roadmaps at my new firm and was considering the creation of multiple sales roadmaps based on the specifics of the respective vertical we are approaching.  The vision remains the same but maybe some jargon is changed and the certain features irrelevant to an industry are removed. This is a thought, I do not recall reading about this anywhere or anything else. It may not be a good idea.  Your thoughts?</p>
<p>  This was merely a thought that I had been contemplating, and perhaps I am missing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Sid, I am not sure I follow this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sid, I am not sure I follow this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I agree Sally on having two versions, but they tend to be two summaries (or presentations) based on a single master. I would hate to see anyone have to keep two (or more) versions in sync.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Sally on having two versions, but they tend to be two summaries (or presentations) based on a single master. I would hate to see anyone have to keep two (or more) versions in sync.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidnayak</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>sidnayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Stewart!  Another item to consider is the development of multiple external roadmaps based on market/product line, based on a single document.  For some firms, this is sensible and helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Stewart!  Another item to consider is the development of multiple external roadmaps based on market/product line, based on a single document.  For some firms, this is sensible and helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sallyoutloud</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/03/20/using-the-roadmap-for-planning-and-selling/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>sallyoutloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1173#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post Stewart!  If you do share the roadmap with prospects, you should create 2 versions, one for internal consumption and one for prospects &amp; sales :).  The external version should NOT align features to planned releases.  As Stewart pointed out, priorities change and you don&#039;t want to box yourself into delivering a specfic feature in the next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post Stewart!  If you do share the roadmap with prospects, you should create 2 versions, one for internal consumption and one for prospects &#038; sales <img src='http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  The external version should NOT align features to planned releases.  As Stewart pointed out, priorities change and you don&#39;t want to box yourself into delivering a specfic feature in the next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

