<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Year in Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2009-year-in-review</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1102#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Great comments Sally. I sometimes wonder, when it comes to Agile, whether they are trying an Agile approach to implementing Agile. The problem that I see, very few seem to be doing the retrospectives needed to improve on what is not working. The basic workings of Agile are quite simple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for your comment on patience, you are spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments Sally. I sometimes wonder, when it comes to Agile, whether they are trying an Agile approach to implementing Agile. The problem that I see, very few seem to be doing the retrospectives needed to improve on what is not working. The basic workings of Agile are quite simple.</p>
<p>As for your comment on patience, you are spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1102#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Great comments Sally. I sometimes wonder, when it comes to Agile, whether they are trying an Agile approach to implementing Agile. The problem that I see, very few seem to be doing the retrospectives needed to improve on what is not working. The basic workings of Agile are quite simple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for your comment on patience, you are spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments Sally. I sometimes wonder, when it comes to Agile, whether they are trying an Agile approach to implementing Agile. The problem that I see, very few seem to be doing the retrospectives needed to improve on what is not working. The basic workings of Agile are quite simple.</p>
<p>As for your comment on patience, you are spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 2009 Year in Review » Strategic Product Manager -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention 2009 Year in Review » Strategic Product Manager -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1102#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stewart Rogers, Elaine Chen and Sally Duda, Santosh. Santosh said: RT @chenelaine RT @StewartRogers 2009 Year in Review http://is.gd/6QjpB #prodmgmt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stewart Rogers, Elaine Chen and Sally Duda, Santosh. Santosh said: RT @chenelaine RT @StewartRogers 2009 Year in Review <a href="http://is.gd/6QjpB" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/6QjpB</a> #prodmgmt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sallyoutloud</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2010/01/22/2009-year-in-review/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>sallyoutloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=1102#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Stewart,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comments about agile are dead-on.  It&#039;s a shame that some companies are unwilling to seek outside assistance on important initiatives.  Why is that?  How much time and resources (i.e. money) can they afford to waste while they figure out how to implement agile successfully?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that product managers are still &quot;struggling with the same problems in 2009 as they were in 2006&quot;.  Politics plays a part.  The nature of the work we do involves understanding and effectively dealing with company politics.  That takes a certain set of skills and patience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart,</p>
<p>Your comments about agile are dead-on.  It&#39;s a shame that some companies are unwilling to seek outside assistance on important initiatives.  Why is that?  How much time and resources (i.e. money) can they afford to waste while they figure out how to implement agile successfully?</p>
<p>I agree that product managers are still &#8220;struggling with the same problems in 2009 as they were in 2006&#8243;.  Politics plays a part.  The nature of the work we do involves understanding and effectively dealing with company politics.  That takes a certain set of skills and patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

