<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts (to date) for First Half 2010 &#187; Strategic Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts (to date) for First Half 2010 &#187; Strategic Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness &#8212; #1 all time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness &#8212; #1 all time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 Posts from 2009 &#187; Strategic Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 5 Posts from 2009 &#187; Strategic Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-190</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategy Recap Strategic Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategy Recap Strategic Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Information Technology Driving Your Strategy Strategic Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Technology Driving Your Strategy Strategic Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-63</guid>
		<description>[...] In short it covers the basics on improving your company performance by standardizing your processes and/or enhancing individual discretion. It talks about how companies that focus on purely being more effective continue to deploy best practices that in all likely hood are either being used by others or will be used by others. It is a cat and mouse game. I have covered this topic in a little more detail here: What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In short it covers the basics on improving your company performance by standardizing your processes and/or enhancing individual discretion. It talks about how companies that focus on purely being more effective continue to deploy best practices that in all likely hood are either being used by others or will be used by others. It is a cat and mouse game. I have covered this topic in a little more detail here: What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am Unique, Therefore I am Strategic &#8212; Strategic Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>I am Unique, Therefore I am Strategic &#8212; Strategic Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] November-December 1996, Michael E. Porter) and this post continues from a previous post, &#8220;What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness,&#8221; that reviewed the first section of the article &#8220;Operational Effectiveness Is Not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November-December 1996, Michael E. Porter) and this post continues from a previous post, &#8220;What is Strategy? Not Operational Effectiveness,&#8221; that reviewed the first section of the article &#8220;Operational Effectiveness Is Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#039;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.&lt;br&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#39;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.<br />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#039;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#8217;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#039;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.&lt;br&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Southwest piece is an excellent example.  I haven&#39;t completely digested the full article, it has so much great content that I am taking my time to consume and understand it. More posts to follow.<br />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeBoudreaux</title>
		<link>http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/2009/02/07/what-is-strategy-not-operational-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeBoudreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strategicproductmanager.com/?p=180#comment-20</guid>
		<description>This is one of my favorite business strategy articles. The key takeaway that I took from this article is one that I always fall back on. Strategy is choosing what NOT to do and focusing all activies based on that decision!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Porter offers the following definition of strategy:&lt;br&gt;- Strategy is the creation of a unique and valuable position, involving a different set of activities.&lt;br&gt;- Strategy is making trade-offs in competing - choosing what not to do.&lt;br&gt;- Strategic is creating fit among a company&#039;s activities. The success of strategy depends on doing many things well, not just a few, and integrating among them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OE is performing the same things as your competitors, but doing it better. This leads to hypercompetition and commoditization because nobody is differentiated. Companies will get short-term games from OE, but it doesn&#039;t provide sustainable profitability.  Competition based on OE is mutually destructive and hurts the entire industry, because everyone is racing down the same path that can&#039;t be won because they are continually pushing out the productivity frontier.  In the end, the only group that wins from OE is the customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, strategic positioning is the key to profitability. By doing different things, or doing the same things differently, competitors can differentiate in a sustainable way.  His use of Southwest Airlines as an example was perfect, because most people think that they differentiate through OE. They might have great OE, but this is only a result of their strategic positioning - to serve price and convenience sensitive travellers.  They have differentiation from their competitors because they have made choices about what they won&#039;t do, based on their strategic positioning.  They are focused on their strategic position and this is why they are so successful.  Continental tried to straddle their strategy to counter Southwest by introducing Continental Lite, but you can&#039;t be focused this way.  The tradeoffs required to be successful as a low cost carrier can&#039;t be comprimised.  Continental could not match up to Southwest because continued to fly out of busy hub airports and extended their frequent flyer program to Continental Lite. They did not choose not to do these things, a strategic error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of my favorite business strategy articles. The key takeaway that I took from this article is one that I always fall back on. Strategy is choosing what NOT to do and focusing all activies based on that decision!</p>
<p>Porter offers the following definition of strategy:<br />- Strategy is the creation of a unique and valuable position, involving a different set of activities.<br />- Strategy is making trade-offs in competing &#8211; choosing what not to do.<br />- Strategic is creating fit among a company&#39;s activities. The success of strategy depends on doing many things well, not just a few, and integrating among them.</p>
<p>OE is performing the same things as your competitors, but doing it better. This leads to hypercompetition and commoditization because nobody is differentiated. Companies will get short-term games from OE, but it doesn&#39;t provide sustainable profitability.  Competition based on OE is mutually destructive and hurts the entire industry, because everyone is racing down the same path that can&#39;t be won because they are continually pushing out the productivity frontier.  In the end, the only group that wins from OE is the customer.</p>
<p>On the other hand, strategic positioning is the key to profitability. By doing different things, or doing the same things differently, competitors can differentiate in a sustainable way.  His use of Southwest Airlines as an example was perfect, because most people think that they differentiate through OE. They might have great OE, but this is only a result of their strategic positioning &#8211; to serve price and convenience sensitive travellers.  They have differentiation from their competitors because they have made choices about what they won&#39;t do, based on their strategic positioning.  They are focused on their strategic position and this is why they are so successful.  Continental tried to straddle their strategy to counter Southwest by introducing Continental Lite, but you can&#39;t be focused this way.  The tradeoffs required to be successful as a low cost carrier can&#39;t be comprimised.  Continental could not match up to Southwest because continued to fly out of busy hub airports and extended their frequent flyer program to Continental Lite. They did not choose not to do these things, a strategic error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

